Indicators on h4831sc load data You Should Know

Since there doesn't seem like any "official" Load Data to choose from for this Load, can some of you deliver a starting point with this mixture and items to consider when Doing the job this Load up?

H4831 will perform within the Swift but not actual perfectly. You will in no way obtain the pressures you will need for regularity Along with the .223. 760, or H414 will probably be improved but for some explanation I ain't the largest fan of most ball powders.

4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I found this combo provides .5MOA groups with velocity about 3020fps outside of a 26" barrel. I use this exact powder in my 300wm capturing 180gr products, so It truly is nice to possess just one powder for the two.

Operate your load up with the specific powder (sc or common) and ton you might be applying however. Same burn up level doesn't mean it can behave "particularly" exactly the same. I've viewed more than one hundred fps distinction between sc and mil-surp lots of H4831.

some cartridges are inclined copper foul more than Other individuals however, in spite of how sleek the complete is over the bore and require cleansing on the copper fouling additional normally.

Because there isn't going to appear to be any "Formal" Load Data out there for this Load, can a few of you offer a starting point with this combination and issues to think about when Operating this Load up?

If there is absolutely no load data it truly is due to the fact this powder is just not suited to this cartridge. Normally one won't discover one powder to suit all cartridges, along with the relatives of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) that you're inquiring about isn't going to function.

If you have some heavier .224" bullets, you may perhaps discover a load that actually works OK Along with the 4831. The bullets I tried that were about 70 grains wouldn't stabilize in my rifle, which had the typical fourteen" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the biggest bullet that could h4831sc stabilize, but it did that beautifully. It's a humorous-looking bullet using a rounded nose profile, but it really shoots fantastic and kills properly. Deer out to about a hundred and fifty yards al went down right away with rib-cage hits.

I have observed the precise reverse to be correct in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably quicker and Similarly correct powder in my 300 Acquire Mag.

Ballistically, this Excessive Extruded powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Bodily, it's got h4831 vs h4831sc a shorter grain size, as a result, the designation SC or small Slash. The shorter, much more compact kernels allow the powder to movement throughout the powder actions additional effortlessly, assisting to ease the constant cutting of granules.

Kansas Town, MO I might grab whichever is h4831 vs h4831sc on the market right this moment. I’ve utilized both while with my head to load and didn’t see anything unique performance clever.

It really is very likely that no more discussion is needed, through which scenario we propose setting up a new thread. If nevertheless you're feeling your response is required you are able to nonetheless do so.

rayporter mentioned: i never ever recognized a change other than the regular is like rolling cordwood onto the the pan. Simply click to expand...

If I've a pound or two of a powder and obtain additional of the same, only a special ton selection, I'll mix them all up in order that I have a homogeneous batch of powder with which to work.